summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/pages
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>2020-02-10 14:18:18 +0100
committerAndy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>2020-02-10 17:29:51 +0100
commitb347d01a9c5b528ac262ad457ef167af3cee57ba (patch)
treefa963ed4e45e3622b621e92bed4a82cf26597aa1 /pages
parentAdd feedback (diff)
Add feedback gathered by Mark
Diffstat (limited to 'pages')
-rw-r--r--pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt27
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt b/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt
index 4072005..80deb0c 100644
--- a/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt
+++ b/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt
@@ -64,6 +64,14 @@ Some concerns about the “level of experience”; proposed rewording
64> sexual orientation, level of experience, or any other personal 64> sexual orientation, level of experience, or any other personal
65> characteristics. 65> characteristics.
66 66
67Related comment:
68
69> "welcomes contributions" could be read as "accepts all
70> contributions". Might be fixed by moving the important part first
71> so it would read: "The GNU Project commits to providing a
72> harassment-free experience for all contributors. It wants to
73> give..."
74
67# External threats 75# External threats
68 76
69> A native speaker sent this to me: 77> A native speaker sent this to me:
@@ -104,4 +112,23 @@ Some concerns about the “level of experience”; proposed rewording
104> for contribution are left entirely up to the individual. 112> for contribution are left entirely up to the individual.
105> 113>
106 114
115# Implications regarding non-GNU activity
116
117> Does adhering to this "social contract" mean that as a GNU developer
118> I should not work at <state sponsored spying agency>, <proprietary
119> company> or <privacy violating entity>.
120
121# A wording suggestion
122
123> "pays attention and responds to" should be "pays attention to and
124> responds to" or "pays attention to, and responds to," or "monitors
125> and responds to".
126
127# A general meta-question regarding why the document is needed
128
129> The tone and content of the draft contract are not changed from
130> existing practice. But give a better explanation of why a
131> restatement of the GNU project's goals and standards is needed, and
132> where it differs from the goals/standards in previous years.
133
107</markdown> 134</markdown>