diff options
| author | Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com> | 2020-02-10 14:05:05 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com> | 2020-02-10 17:29:47 +0100 |
| commit | 957b641c5e3a6646e958decfc9417f4ca39be016 (patch) | |
| tree | 9ea39143998592c9b9746301076c6b07b0286443 /pages | |
| parent | gsc-feedback: Add proposed rewording for last section. (diff) | |
Add feedback
Diffstat (limited to 'pages')
| -rw-r--r-- | pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt | 40 |
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt b/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt index 9accf5a..4072005 100644 --- a/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt +++ b/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt | |||
| @@ -64,4 +64,44 @@ Some concerns about the “level of experience”; proposed rewording | |||
| 64 | > sexual orientation, level of experience, or any other personal | 64 | > sexual orientation, level of experience, or any other personal |
| 65 | > characteristics. | 65 | > characteristics. |
| 66 | 66 | ||
| 67 | # External threats | ||
| 68 | |||
| 69 | > A native speaker sent this to me: | ||
| 70 | > | ||
| 71 | > > > the GNU Project pays attention and responds to | ||
| 72 | > > | ||
| 73 | > > IMHO missing "to" | ||
| 74 | > > | ||
| 75 | > > "pays attention to..." | ||
| 76 | > > | ||
| 77 | > > optionally "pays attention to, and responds to, ..." | ||
| 78 | > > | ||
| 79 | > > or "monitors and responds to" | ||
| 80 | > | ||
| 81 | > I agree with the proposal and would go for: | ||
| 82 | > | ||
| 83 | > the GNU Project pays attention to, and responds to threats | ||
| 84 | > | ||
| 85 | > Should we discuss this on gnu-misc-discuss or just apply the change? | ||
| 86 | |||
| 87 | # GSC signature required for contribution? | ||
| 88 | |||
| 89 | > > Just to clarify here, do you mean to say that you do not | ||
| 90 | > > want to make endorsement of the GNU Social Contract a | ||
| 91 | > > requirement for contributing to GNU Foo? If I | ||
| 92 | > > misunderstood you, please feel free to correct me. | ||
| 93 | > | ||
| 94 | > No you have it exactly right. | ||
| 95 | > | ||
| 96 | > One point that might be helpful is to include a reference | ||
| 97 | > to this in the actual contract itself. Eg by adding | ||
| 98 | > something like this to the "welcomes contributions" | ||
| 99 | > section: | ||
| 100 | > | ||
| 101 | > This contract is voluntary - there is no enforcement | ||
| 102 | > or oversight enacted and there is no requirement that | ||
| 103 | > any contributor should adhere to it. Motivations | ||
| 104 | > for contribution are left entirely up to the individual. | ||
| 105 | > | ||
| 106 | |||
| 67 | </markdown> | 107 | </markdown> |