From b347d01a9c5b528ac262ad457ef167af3cee57ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Wingo Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:18:18 +0100 Subject: Add feedback gathered by Mark --- pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) (limited to 'pages') diff --git a/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt b/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt index 4072005..80deb0c 100644 --- a/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt +++ b/pages/gnu/gsc-feedback.txt @@ -64,6 +64,14 @@ Some concerns about the “level of experience”; proposed rewording > sexual orientation, level of experience, or any other personal > characteristics. +Related comment: + +> "welcomes contributions" could be read as "accepts all +> contributions". Might be fixed by moving the important part first +> so it would read: "The GNU Project commits to providing a +> harassment-free experience for all contributors. It wants to +> give..." + # External threats > A native speaker sent this to me: @@ -104,4 +112,23 @@ Some concerns about the “level of experience”; proposed rewording > for contribution are left entirely up to the individual. > +# Implications regarding non-GNU activity + +> Does adhering to this "social contract" mean that as a GNU developer +> I should not work at , company> or . + +# A wording suggestion + +> "pays attention and responds to" should be "pays attention to and +> responds to" or "pays attention to, and responds to," or "monitors +> and responds to". + +# A general meta-question regarding why the document is needed + +> The tone and content of the draft contract are not changed from +> existing practice. But give a better explanation of why a +> restatement of the GNU project's goals and standards is needed, and +> where it differs from the goals/standards in previous years. + -- cgit v1.2.1