diff options
author | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2020-01-26 22:32:52 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2020-01-27 14:48:42 +0100 |
commit | c087aabf1356c92101f85c5f154220c8086da396 (patch) | |
tree | 2eb044e9488fe90bcc03933e8bca93e6170748a8 /code | |
parent | Add colon at the end of software:classpath: since it is a namespace. (diff) |
Add Social Contract email.
* code/sc-email.txt: New file.
Diffstat (limited to 'code')
-rw-r--r-- | code/sc-email.txt | 85 |
1 files changed, 85 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/code/sc-email.txt b/code/sc-email.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4433d08 --- /dev/null +++ b/code/sc-email.txt | |||
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ | |||
1 | To: maintainer@example.org | ||
2 | |||
3 | Dear GNU maintainer, | ||
4 | |||
5 | You are receiving this message because you are listed as responsible for | ||
6 | a GNU package in the ‘maintainers’ file on fencepost.gnu.org. If you | ||
7 | think this is inaccurate, or if you no longer want to be contacted about | ||
8 | this initiative, please let us know about it. | ||
9 | |||
10 | The authors of this message have started an effort to devise a GNU | ||
11 | “social contract”. We hope the social contract will help build a shared | ||
12 | understanding of our mission as part of GNU. | ||
13 | |||
14 | Work has been on-going on the public gnu-misc-discuss mailing list since | ||
15 | October 2019, with comments from several GNU volunteers, in the “GNU | ||
16 | social contract” threads below: | ||
17 | |||
18 | https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2019-10/threads.html | ||
19 | https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2019-11/threads.html | ||
20 | https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2019-12/threads.html | ||
21 | https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2020-01/threads.html | ||
22 | |||
23 | A first draft resulting from these discussions is attached below and can | ||
24 | be seen at: | ||
25 | |||
26 | XXX (meta.gnu.tools URL) | ||
27 | |||
28 | The goal of this document is to state the core values GNU maintainers | ||
29 | and uploaders and contributors who have endorsed it are committed to | ||
30 | uphold. It is both an agreement among us, GNU contributors, and a | ||
31 | pledge to the broader free software community. Additionally, we think | ||
32 | it can be a first step towards formalizing a transparent and collective | ||
33 | governance of the GNU Project. | ||
34 | |||
35 | We are sending this message to all the GNU volunteers responsible for a | ||
36 | GNU package for which we have the contact information so that they can | ||
37 | take part in the making of the GNU Social Contract. We hope you can | ||
38 | share this with other members of your project for the next step (see | ||
39 | below). The proposed timeline is the following: | ||
40 | |||
41 | 1. By February 9th, 2020, we invite you to send feedback about the | ||
42 | draft GNU Social Contract to gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org (you first | ||
43 | need to subscribe at | ||
44 | <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss>). | ||
45 | |||
46 | Please introduce yourself as GNU maintainer. Note that up to XXX | ||
47 | maintainers might contribute to the discussions; make sure that | ||
48 | your contributions are focused and to-the-point. Alternately, you | ||
49 | can choose to email your feedback privately to <XXX@gnu.tools>. | ||
50 | |||
51 | We also encourage you to discuss this topic on your project’s | ||
52 | channels during that time to get some feedback whether other | ||
53 | members would be willing to endorse the GNU Social Contract or | ||
54 | would like improvements to the text before doing so. | ||
55 | |||
56 | 2. On February 10th, we will upload an updated version of the Social | ||
57 | Contract, version 1.0, to XXX (meta.gnu.tools URL). | ||
58 | |||
59 | 3. We ask you to send a message, by February 24th, preferably signed | ||
60 | with your OpenPGP key, to gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org and | ||
61 | XXX@gnu.tools, containing one of the following statements: | ||
62 | |||
63 | • I, maintainer of package X, endorse version 1.0 of the GNU | ||
64 | Social Contract, available at XXX (meta.gnu.tools URL). | ||
65 | |||
66 | • I, maintainer of package X, do not adhere to version 1.0 of the | ||
67 | GNU Social Contract, available at XXX. | ||
68 | |||
69 | 4. In the following days, we will publish at XXX the list of GNU | ||
70 | package maintainers who endorse as well as those who reject version | ||
71 | 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract. | ||
72 | |||
73 | One of the next action items we may collectively undertake at the end | ||
74 | of this process is defining “membership” in the GNU Project. This, in | ||
75 | turn, will allow us to ask all the project members (including sysadmins, | ||
76 | web masters, developers) whether they would endorse the GNU Social | ||
77 | Contract. | ||
78 | |||
79 | Thanks in advance for your participation! | ||
80 | |||
81 | - Ludovic Courtès | ||
82 | - Andreas Enge | ||
83 | - Carlos O’Donell | ||
84 | - Mark Wielaard | ||
85 | - Andy Wingo | ||