faq: Publish.

* drafts/faq.md: Move to...
* posts/faq.md: ... here.  Remove "DRAFT" and adjust date.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 96 deletions

diff --git a/drafts/faq.md b/drafts/faq.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 92e03d8..0000000
--- a/drafts/faq.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,96 +0,0 @@
-title: DRAFT Answering frequently asked questions
-author: The GNU Assembly
-date: 2021-04-20 16:00:00
----
-
-**DRAFT**
-
-Following the [Assembly
-kick-off](https://web.gnu.tools/en/blog/2021/04/kicking-off-the-gnu-assembly/),
-we received lots of questions and read comments that deserved answers.
-This post attempts to answer the most common questions.
-
-# Meta-question: why so much confusion around GNU/FSF?
-
-Good question!  A common belief is that GNU and the Free Software
-Foundation (FSF) are the same thing.  This is untrue: GNU is not a
-registered non-profit, it’s an informal association among contributors,
-separate from the FSF.  The FSF is oblivious to technical matters in
-GNU.
-
-The FSF supports GNU development primarily in three ways: As legal
-guardian (copyright assignments, acting on legal disputes or legal
-representation), as [fiscal sponsor](https://www.fsf.org/working-together/fund)
-for some GNU packages, and by providing infrastructure like
-[Savannah](https://savannah.gnu.org).
-
-# Is this a fork of GNU?
-
-No.  The [software in question](/en/software) is not being forked and
-the people who write that software remain the same.
-
-What changes is how these people organize themselves beyond their
-individual projects—from a
-[BDFL](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benevolent_dictator_for_life)
-top-down model to a [community-oriented, consensus-based
-model](https://gnu.tools/en/documents/governance/).
-
-# Is the GNU Assembly an initiative of an existing Free Software organization or is it sponsored by a specific corporation?
-
-No, it’s not!  The Assembly was founded by GNU maintainers on personal
-title and receives no support, financial or otherwise, from any
-organization at this time.  At the moment the Assembly uses the
-resources of the individuals listed.  We will publicly list anybody or
-any organization that provides us with sponsorship or resources to be
-completely transparent.
-
-# You’re just a minority anyway
-
-That’s not a question, but you’re right: about [30 people](/en/people),
-mostly appointed GNU maintainers, endorsed the [Social
-Contract](/en/documents/social-contract) so far and may participate in
-the Assembly.  The number keeps increasing but is still a fraction of
-the number of contributors to GNU packages: there are 300+ GNU
-maintainers “on file”, though not everyone and [not each project is
-active](https://wingolog.org/archives/2020/02/09/state-of-the-gnunion-2020),
-[some](https://github.com/gnuradio/gr-governance/blob/main/aoa.md)
-[even](https://www.r-project.org/foundation/)
-[left](https://lwn.net/Articles/529522/)
-[years](https://wingolog.org/archives/2009/12/13/gnu-gnome-and-the-fsf)
-[ago](https://discourse.gnome.org/t/relation-between-gimp-and-gnome/2376/8)
-for all practical purposes despite being [still
-listed](https://www.gnu.org/software)—these projects have their own
-governance model and rules, independent of “the rest of GNU”.
-
-Anyway, is being a minority a problem?  We don’t think so: we hope this
-platform appeals to many GNU contributors and contributors-to-be, but we
-can do great things even without on-boarding everyone!
-
-# Why now?  Is this really about <current event>?
-
-While current events certainly motivated the decision to make our 
-efforts more visible, the desire for stronger collaboration 
-between GNU packages and for communal decision-making as it 
-pertains to a shared vision has been the subject of many 
-discussions among GNU maintainers and contributors over the past 
-decade or so.
-
-# Why didn’t you try to effect change from the inside?
-
-We did!  It goes back to [at least ten
-years](/en/blog/2021/04/kicking-off-the-gnu-assembly/).  The project was
-met with enthusiasm from some and hostility from others.  That’s fine,
-we don’t have to agree!
-
-Unfortunately, GNU would host project-wide discussions on private
-mailing lists, so these discussions and soul searching were only known
-to “insiders”.  The Assembly is determined to have transparent
-processes; everything we did, starting with the drafting process of the
-Social Contract in 2019–2020, was done publicly.
-
-# Do you support PDP-11 assembly?
-
-Some of us write assembly code (not sure about
-[PDP-11](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDP-11) though), but all this is
-about [a different kind of
-“assembly”](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_assembly).