summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLudovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>2021-04-21 15:49:27 +0200
committerLudovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>2021-04-21 15:49:27 +0200
commit24308e67c797f6d2aa72f2a7ea982926549f7479 (patch)
treeece4243aa54bc315386c985143564e0ddf324f4e
parentfaq: Follow Markdown syntax for headings. (diff)
faq: Remove suboptimal "territory" analogy.
* drafts/faq.md: Remove the analogy with "territory" and "central government".
-rw-r--r--drafts/faq.md4
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drafts/faq.md b/drafts/faq.md
index 2c027fc..92e03d8 100644
--- a/drafts/faq.md
+++ b/drafts/faq.md
@@ -60,9 +60,7 @@ active](https://wingolog.org/archives/2020/02/09/state-of-the-gnunion-2020),
60[ago](https://discourse.gnome.org/t/relation-between-gimp-and-gnome/2376/8) 60[ago](https://discourse.gnome.org/t/relation-between-gimp-and-gnome/2376/8)
61for all practical purposes despite being [still 61for all practical purposes despite being [still
62listed](https://www.gnu.org/software)—these projects have their own 62listed](https://www.gnu.org/software)—these projects have their own
63governance model and rules, independent of “the rest of GNU”. To put it 63governance model and rules, independent of “the rest of GNU”.
64differently, significant parts of GNU territory is no longer controlled
65by the central government, if we dare such an analogy.
66 64
67Anyway, is being a minority a problem? We don’t think so: we hope this 65Anyway, is being a minority a problem? We don’t think so: we hope this
68platform appeals to many GNU contributors and contributors-to-be, but we 66platform appeals to many GNU contributors and contributors-to-be, but we