Dear GNU maintainer, You are receiving this message because you are listed as responsible for a GNU package in the ‘maintainers’ file on fencepost.gnu.org. If you think this is inaccurate, or if you no longer want to be contacted about this initiative, please let us know about it. The authors of this message have started an effort to devise a GNU “social contract”. We hope the social contract will help build a shared understanding of our mission as part of GNU. Work has been on-going on the public gnu-misc-discuss mailing list since October 2019, with comments from several GNU volunteers, in the “GNU social contract” threads below: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2019-10/threads.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2019-11/threads.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2019-12/threads.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2020-01/threads.html A first draft resulting from these discussions is attached below and can be seen at: https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-contract The goal of this document is to state the core values GNU maintainers and uploaders and contributors who have endorsed it are committed to uphold. It is both an agreement among us, GNU contributors, and a pledge to the broader free software community. Additionally, we think it can be a first step towards formalizing a transparent and collective governance of the GNU Project. We are sending this message to all the GNU volunteers responsible for a GNU package for which we have the contact information so that they can take part in the making of the GNU Social Contract. We hope you can share this with other members of your project for the next step (see below). The proposed timeline is the following: 1. By February 9th, 2020, we invite you to send feedback about the draft GNU Social Contract to gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org (you first need to subscribe at ). Please introduce yourself as GNU maintainer. Note that up to 400 maintainers might contribute to the discussions; make sure that your contributions are focused and to-the-point. Alternately, you can choose to email your feedback privately to . We also encourage you to discuss this topic on your project’s channels during that time to get some feedback whether other members would be willing to endorse the GNU Social Contract or would like improvements to the text before doing so. 2. On February 10th, we will upload an updated version of the Social Contract, version 1.0, to . 3. We ask you to send a message, by February 24th, preferably signed with your OpenPGP key, to gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org and social-contract@gnu.tools, containing one of the following statements: • I, maintainer of package X, endorse version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract, available at . • I, maintainer of package X, do not adhere to version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract, available at . 4. In the following days, we will publish at the list of GNU package maintainers who endorse as well as those who reject version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract. One of the next action items we may collectively undertake at the end of this process is defining “membership” in the GNU Project. This, in turn, will allow us to ask all the project members (including sysadmins, web masters, developers) whether they would endorse the GNU Social Contract. Thanks in advance for your participation! - Ludovic Courtès - Andreas Enge - Carlos O’Donell - Mark Wielaard - Andy Wingo