1 files changed, 16 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/code/sc-email.txt b/code/sc-email.txt
index 4433d08..1e6cf4e 100644
--- a/code/sc-email.txt
+++ b/code/sc-email.txt
@@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
-To: maintainer@example.org
-
 Dear GNU maintainer,
 
 You are receiving this message because you are listed as responsible for
-a GNU package in the ‘maintainers’ file on fencepost.gnu.org. If you
+a GNU package in the ‘maintainers’ file on fencepost.gnu.org.  If you
 think this is inaccurate, or if you no longer want to be contacted about
 this initiative, please let us know about it.
 
@@ -23,7 +21,7 @@ social contract” threads below:
 A first draft resulting from these discussions is attached below and can
 be seen at:
 
-  XXX (meta.gnu.tools URL)
+  https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-contract
 
 The goal of this document is to state the core values GNU maintainers
 and uploaders and contributors who have endorsed it are committed to
@@ -43,10 +41,11 @@ below).  The proposed timeline is the following:
      need to subscribe at
      <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss>).
 
-     Please introduce yourself as GNU maintainer.  Note that up to XXX
+     Please introduce yourself as GNU maintainer.  Note that up to 400
      maintainers might contribute to the discussions; make sure that
      your contributions are focused and to-the-point.  Alternately, you
-     can choose to email your feedback privately to <XXX@gnu.tools>.
+     can choose to email your feedback privately to
+     <social-contract@gnu.tools>.
 
      We also encourage you to discuss this topic on your project’s
      channels during that time to get some feedback whether other
@@ -54,21 +53,25 @@ below).  The proposed timeline is the following:
      would like improvements to the text before doing so.
 
   2. On February 10th, we will upload an updated version of the Social
-     Contract, version 1.0, to XXX (meta.gnu.tools URL).
+     Contract, version 1.0, to <https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-contract>.
 
   3. We ask you to send a message, by February 24th, preferably signed
      with your OpenPGP key, to gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org and
-     XXX@gnu.tools, containing one of the following statements:
+     social-contract@gnu.tools, containing one of the following
+     statements:
 
        • I, maintainer of package X, endorse version 1.0 of the GNU
-         Social Contract, available at XXX (meta.gnu.tools URL).
+         Social Contract, available at
+         <https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-contract>.
 
        • I, maintainer of package X, do not adhere to version 1.0 of the
-         GNU Social Contract, available at XXX.
+         GNU Social Contract, available at
+         <https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-contract>.
 
-  4. In the following days, we will publish at XXX the list of GNU
-     package maintainers who endorse as well as those who reject version
-     1.0 of the GNU Social Contract.
+  4. In the following days, we will publish at
+     <https://wiki.gnu.tools/gnu:social-contract-endorsement> the list
+     of GNU package maintainers who endorse as well as those who reject
+     version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract.
 
 One of the next action items we may collectively undertake at the end
 of this process is defining “membership” in the GNU Project.  This, in